-
Dominguez Thaysen posted an update 3 months, 1 week ago
Unfractionated heparin (UFH) therapy is monitored by using the anti-Xa activity, or the aPTT, which remains the most widely used assay. One of the main advantages of anti-Xa relies on its hypothesized standardization, with a unique therapeutic range (0.30-0.70 IU/mL) for all reagents, whereas aPTT is influenced by numerous preanalytical and analytical parameters not related to the anticoagulant activity of UFH.
The aim of this study was to compare the anti-Xa-correlated aPTT therapeutic ranges calculated using different combinations of aPTT (n=4) and anti-Xa reagents (n=4) in frozen citrated plasmas from 87 inpatients on UFH.
The median aPTT ratio ranged from 2.19 for the less sensitive to 3.23 for the most sensitive reagent, whereas the median anti-Xa activity was between 0.37 IU/mL and 0.57 IU/mL. The aPTT therapeutic ranges calculated to correlate with anti-Xa activities between 0.30 and 0.70 IU/mL were found to be highly different from one combination of aPTT reagent and analyzer to another. The same applied to the therapeutic range of a single aPTT reagent calculated using different anti-Xa assays performed on the same analyzer, leading to a lack of agreement as to whether a sample was classified as subtherapeutic, therapeutic or supratherapeutic in 8.0% to 23.0% of the patients, with kappa coefficients between 0.908 and 0.753.
These results suggest that the aPTT therapeutic range calculated to correlate with anti-Xa activities between 0.30 and 0.70 IU/mL is influenced not only by the aPTT reagent, but also by the anti-Xa reagent used for calculation.
These results suggest that the aPTT therapeutic range calculated to correlate with anti-Xa activities between 0.30 and 0.70 IU/mL is influenced not only by the aPTT reagent, but also by the anti-Xa reagent used for calculation.
Recent advances in molecular diagnostic technologies allow for the evaluation of solid tumor malignancies through noninvasive blood sampling, including circulating tumor DNA profiling (ctDNA). Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has a poor prognosis, often because of late presentation of disease. Diagnosis is often made using endoscopic ultrasound or endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, which often does not yield enough tissue for next-generation sequencing. With this study, we sought to characterize the ctDNA genomic alteration landscape in patients with advanced PDAC with a focus on actionable findings.
From December 2014 through October 2019, 357 samples collected from 282 patients with PDAC at Mayo Clinic underwent ctDNA testing using a clinically available assay. The majority of samples were tested using the 73-gene panel which includes somatic genomic targets, including complete or critical exon coverage in 30 and 40 genes, respectively, and in some, amplifications, fusions, and indeln due to late presentation of disease. Biopsy tissue sampling is invasive and samples are often inadequate, requiring repeated invasive procedures and delays in treatment. Noninvasive methods to identify PDAC early in its course may improve prognosis in PDAC. Using ctDNA, targetable genes can be identified and used for treatment.
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has a poor prognosis often due to late presentation of disease. Biopsy tissue sampling is invasive and samples are often inadequate, requiring repeated invasive procedures and delays in treatment. PLX5622 price Noninvasive methods to identify PDAC early in its course may improve prognosis in PDAC. Using ctDNA, targetable genes can be identified and used for treatment.Physiological states can determine the ability of organisms to handle stress. Does this mean that the same selection pressure will lead to different evolutionary outcomes, depending on the organisms’ physiological state? If yes, what will be the genomic signatures of such adaptation(s)? We used experimental evolution in Escherichia coli followed by whole-genome whole-population sequencing to investigate these questions. The sensitivity of Escherichia coli to ultraviolet (UV) radiation depends on the growth phase during which it experiences the radiation. We evolved replicate E. coli populations under two different conditions of UV exposures, namely exposure during the lag and the exponential growth phases. Initially, the UV sensitivity of the ancestor was greater during the exponential phase than the lag phase. However, at the end of 100 cycles of exposure, UV resistance evolved to similar extents in both treatments. Genome analysis showed that mutations in genes involved in DNA repair, cell membrane structure and RNA polymerase were common in both treatments. However, different functional groups were found mutated in populations experiencing lag and exponential UV treatment. In the former, genes involved in transcriptional and translational regulations and cellular transport were mutated, whereas the latter treatment showed mutations in genes involved in signal transduction and cell adhesion. Interestingly, the treatments showed no phenotypic differences in a number of novel environments. Taken together, these results suggest that selection pressures at different physiological stages can lead to differences in the genomic signatures of adaptation, which need not necessarily translate into observable phenotypic differences.In addition to the conserved translation elongation factors eEF1A and eEF2, fungi require a third essential elongation factor, eEF3. While eEF3 has been implicated in tRNA binding and release at the ribosomal A and E sites, its exact mechanism of action is unclear. Here, we show that eEF3 acts at the mRNA-tRNA translocation step by promoting the dissociation of the tRNA from the E site, but independent of aminoacyl-tRNA recruitment to the A site. Depletion of eEF3 in vivo leads to a general slowdown in translation elongation due to accumulation of ribosomes with an occupied A site. Cryo-EM analysis of native eEF3-ribosome complexes shows that eEF3 facilitates late steps of translocation by favoring non-rotated ribosomal states, as well as by opening the L1 stalk to release the E-site tRNA. Additionally, our analysis provides structural insights into novel translation elongation states, enabling presentation of a revised yeast translation elongation cycle.