Activity

Touton-type giant cells were focally present in 2 cases. Immunohistochemically, tumor spindle, and epithelioid cells were diffusely positive for CD163 and ALK in all cases and focally positive for S100 protein in 1 of the cases. AUPM-170 solubility dmso CD1a and langerin were negative. Actin-positive myofibroblasts were admixed within the tumor in 2 cases, and their reactive nature was highlighted using double immunostaining. Break-apart fluorescence in situ hybridization assay demonstrated gene rearrangements involving KIF5B and ALK in all the 3 cases. ALK-positive histiocytosis rarely occurs as a spindle cell breast tumor, and should be distinguished from other diseases such as inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors and spindled histiocytic reaction.Coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) is caused by a newly discovered coronavirus, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Although SARS-CoV-2 is visualized on electron microscopy, there is an increasing demand for widely applicable techniques to visualize viral components within tissue specimens. Viral protein and RNA can be detected on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue using immunohistochemistry (IHC) and in situ hybridization (ISH), respectively. Herein, we evaluate the staining performance of ISH for SARS-CoV-2 and an IHC directed at the SARS-CoV nucleocapsid protein and compare these results to a gold standard, tissue quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). We evaluated FFPE sections from 8 COVID-19 autopsies, including 19 pulmonary and 39 extrapulmonary samples including the heart, liver, kidney, small intestine, skin, adipose tissue, and bone marrow. We performed RNA-ISH for SARS-CoV-2 on all cases with IHC for SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 qRT-PCR performedT-PCR failed to detect the virus in the heart, liver, and kidney.Reactivation of latent varicella zoster virus (VZV) may be limited to a dermatome or involve multiple organs, including the gastrointestinal tract. Although gastrointestinal manifestations of disseminated zoster have been likened to those of herpes simplex virus (HSV), histologic features of VZV-related injury to the tubular gut are not well-documented. We performed this study to describe the clinicopathologic features of VZV-related gastrointestinal injury. We identified 6 such patients with VZV infection. All involved the upper gastrointestinal tract, affecting the esophagus (n=3), stomach (n=2), or both (n=1). All patients were immunocompromised adults with hematologic malignancies (n=5) or a heart transplant (n=1); 3 with hematologic malignancies had received stem cell transplants. Five patients had cutaneous and gastrointestinal zoster; 1 had gastrointestinal disease alone. When compared with 14 HSV-related esophagitis controls, there were several notable differences. VZV caused hemorrhagic ulcers with nodularity or erythema, whereas HSV produced round, shallow ulcers on a background of nearly normal mucosa (P=0.01). VZV-related ulcers featured fibrin-rich, pauci-inflammatory exudates compared with the macrophage-rich exudates of HSV (P=0.003). The cytopathic changes of VZV were present at all levels of the squamous epithelium, especially in a peripapillary distribution. In contrast, HSV inclusions were located in the superficial layers (P=0.003) and detached keratinocytes. Unlike HSV, VZV involved the stomach, producing hemorrhage accompanied by striking apoptosis in the deep glands. We conclude that VZV produces unique patterns of gastrointestinal injury that facilitate its diagnosis. Recognition of gastrointestinal VZV infection is important because it heralds potentially life-threatening disseminated disease.Only 50% to 70% of patients with mesothelioma report asbestos exposure. Other exposures (eg, radiation) play a role in some cases, but some patients have no obvious cause. We describe a series of patients with long-standing indwelling intra-abdominal shunt catheters who developed malignant peritoneal mesothelioma, suggesting a novel association. We identified 7 patients who had shunts and subsequently developed mesothelioma (5 women; median age 31 y, range 18 to 45 y). Clinical history and pathology materials were reviewed, and RNA sequencing was performed. Clinical presentations varied; 6 patients had hydrocephalus and a ventriculoperitoneal shunt, and 1 patient had portal hypertension and a portoatrial shunt. The median duration of shunt therapy in 5 cases was 29 years (range 12 to 35 y); the remaining 2 patients also had shunts for many years, but specific details were unavailable. Two patients had radiotherapy for malignancies in childhood. One had an alleged exposure to asbestos and 1 had prior exposure to talc. The rest had no known risk factors. Histologically, all tumors were purely epithelioid. Treatments included surgical debulking, chemotherapy, and palliative care. All 7 died of disease (median survival 7 mo, range 1 to 18 mo). Molecular testing showed loss of NF2 and CDKN2A/B and a BAP1 mutation in 1 case, and no genomic alterations associated with mesothelioma in 2 cases. Peritoneal mesothelioma may represent a complication of long-standing indwelling shunt catheters. The mechanism is unknown, but chronic peritoneal irritation may play a role. Albeit rare, mesothelioma should be considered in patients with a shunt who present with new ascites.The separation of benign from malignant mesothelial proliferations is an important clinical but often a difficult morphologic problem. Over the last roughly 10 years a variety of new markers that aid in this separation have been published and some older recommended markers reconsidered. Unlike previous, and largely unusable, empiric immunohistochemical (IHC) stains, these new markers, some using IHC and some using fluourescent in situ hybridization (FISH), are largely based on documented genomic abnormalities in malignant mesotheliomas. However, no marker works in all situations; rather, markers need to be chosen by the morphology of the process in question (epithelial vs. spindled) and the body cavity of interest (pleural vs. peritoneal). It is also important to be familiar with the exact pattern, for example nuclear versus cytoplasmic loss, that indicates a positive test. Furthermore, no single marker is 100% sensitive even with the optimal morphology/location, so that combinations of markers are essential.