Activity

A comprehensive variety of dynamic patterns will correlate with every possible expression of psychopathology. Still, we contend that the gradual development of these patterns through time can be understood in light of general principles governing pattern formation in complex adaptive systems. The article’s concluding section explores the implications for classification, intervention, and public health. The PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023, all rights reserved, belongs to APA.

The development of psychopathology is contingent upon the dynamic interaction between physiological and mental processes, and the ecological environment. The inability of recursive, homeostatic processes to achieve adaptive re-equilibrium is evident. The developmental exposome, in conjunction with considerations of polygenic liability, early exposures, and a multi-level investigation of psychological action and its attendant physiological and neural operations, allows for the realization of this general statement. This article’s introduction seeks to establish foundational principles and illuminate critical terminology necessary to grasping the essence of mental disorder theory. Subsequently, it outlines a model emphasizing epigenetic fluctuations and hypothesizes shared pathways leading to psychopathology. An epigenetic perspective underscores the importance of developmental context and adaptive systems, particularly during early life, while also initiating novel avenues for mechanistic insights. A significant proposal highlights that a finite number of homeostatic biological and psychological mechanisms are prevalent in numerous high-risk environments, possibly encompassing diverse genetic risk factors for psychiatric conditions. The impairment of these mediating systems is a factor in the development of psychological distress. Analyzing dynamic fluctuations in homeostatic mechanisms across multiple units and timeframes can make understanding psychopathology more manageable. Mental disorders’ progression through development necessitates a close examination of recursive processes, mapped over time with sufficient density. The American Psychological Association’s copyright extends to the PsycINFO database record for 2023.

Childhood adversity, a major transdiagnostic risk factor for psychopathology, is implicated in an estimated 31-62% of childhood disorders and 23-42% of adult disorders, according to research by Kessler et al. (2010). Unsolved theoretical problems are a direct result of the ambiguous and probabilistic nature of the connection between adverse childhood experiences and psychopathology. The links are probabilistic in nature, stemming from childhood adversity’s varied impact on the likelihood of diverse forms of psychopathology, not all exposed individuals developing such problems. This article advocates for a forward-thinking approach centered on stress phenotypes, defined as biobehavioral responses to stressors. These sustained responses can impede future functioning through various avenues, such as increased reward-seeking, social withdrawal, and aggressive tendencies. This review is centered around the rising evidence demonstrating that behavioral and biological factors are more influential predictors of psychopathology in stressful circumstances. Building upon this observation, our theoretical framework posits that a more precise and assured model of pathways from childhood adversity to psychopathology can be constructed by characterizing stress phenotypes. Stress phenotypes are defined as the observable behavioral patterns and their correlated biological underpinnings triggered by stressors. Our understanding of mediating pathways leading from childhood adversity to psychopathology is intended to be augmented by this method. Research into stress phenotypes will enhance our ability to provide precise, person-centered mental health interventions, resulting in effective strategies for recognizing, preventing, and treating psychopathology in a variety of individuals. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved.

Social context is frequently highlighted by theoretical accounts of psychopathology as a key factor in psychological dysfunction, and interpersonal difficulties are frequently implicated in a wide range of legacy diagnostic categories, encompassing affective, personality, and thought disorders. Contemporary Integrative Interpersonal Theory (CIIT) endeavors to explain the origin, display, and continuation of socioaffective functioning and dysfunction within the spectrum of analytical levels and temporal dimensions. We stress the imperative of a cohesive strategy for tackling the often-separated difficulties in developing empirically grounded structures, functional descriptions of dynamic processes, and how this synthesis produces theoretical and methodological alignment across diverse levels of analysis, from biological mechanisms to behavioral outputs. CIIT’s potential as a unifying theory is showcased through its ability to generate verifiable hypotheses, thereby strengthening research methods examining psychological disorders within diverse diagnostic classifications and higher-level spectra of psychopathology. In 2023, APA maintains complete ownership of the PsycInfo Database Record.

Numerous psychopathology theories have concentrated on the origin of specific symptoms or disorders from a particular perspective (e.g., genetic, neurobiological, psychological, or environmental). Several biopsychosocial theories offer integrated explanations encompassing various levels and disorders. While these theories offer some insights, they fail to provide a unifying framework that integrates diverse analytical levels. This impedes the explanation of how etiological factors influence neurobiological mechanisms, ultimately resulting in psychopathological conditions. In theoretical neurobiological literature, predictive processing (PP) is posited to offer a conceptually streamlined and biologically grounded framework for realizing this integration. vorinostat inhibitor Within the realm of probabilistic programming (PP), the human brain can be likened to a generative model, its function being to minimize the astonishment derived from sensory input by deducing its origins and actively regulating incoming sensory data through purposeful actions. The psychopathological implications of perception, action, and emotion are encompassed within a unifying model, as described in this account. Consequently, we present evidence for PP’s ability to explain the impact of various factors or stages on psychopathology through iterative updates to the generative model (the thoroughness of the PP framework). In conclusion, we highlight the transdiagnostic relevance of PP by demonstrating how alterations within this framework can explain a diverse spectrum of mental disorders (the comprehensiveness of the PP framework), emphasizing integration with well-established psychosocial models of psychopathology. Regarding the PsycINFO database record from 2023, all rights are owned by the APA.

Our transdiagnostic approach revolves around modes, state-like manifestations of personality operating as unified organizational elements. Modes are identifiable through the consistent coactivation of distinct patterns in affects, behaviors, cognitions, and desires. Typically, each mode of experience has its own special experiential and agentic qualities. Dynamic modeling of personality states, a key feature of the mode-based approach to psychopathology, is supported by recent analytic and methodological developments, and is further justified by a long-standing theoretical and empirical tradition emphasizing the pragmatic clinical relevance of such models. We endeavor to illustrate the substantial transdiagnostic implications of conceptualizing psychopathology as a system of interacting modes. This mode-based approach to psychopathology is structured on a foundation of research from philosophical accounts of selfhood, developmental psychology, social and personality psychology, and various psychotherapy models. We augment this core concept, and in Section 1 of our online supplemental materials, we furnish examples demonstrating its relevance to various categories of psychopathology, encompassing dissociative, trauma-related, mood, anxiety, obsessive-compulsive, substance use, psychotic, and personality disorders. Having considered the clinical applicability of mode-based conceptualizations, we delineate a research roadmap for evaluating and modeling modes, and (in Section 2 of the online supplemental materials) present a broader research agenda that includes compelling empirical questions related to modes in psychopathology. In our concluding observations, we underscore the suitability of the current period for the reintroduction of modes as a conceptual tool for analyzing psychopathology and personality. Provide this JSON schema structure: list[sentence]

The definition of psychopathology is frequently anchored, explicitly or implicitly, in statistical deviation. This condition necessitates a significant divergence from the norm in some aspect of psychological or neurological function for an affected individual. Decades of psychiatric study have largely revolved around the idea of deviant neural processes, treating mental disorders as stemming from brain dysfunction. We find these conceptualizations to be inappropriate. We recently introduced a novel psychopathology theory, grounded in cybernetics and augmented by neuroscience, psychometrics, and personality theory (DeYoung & Krueger, 2018a). This theory argues that fluctuations from typical psychological and neural operations serve as important precursors to psychopathology, but they are not alone sufficient to classify a condition as psychopathology, which hinges on the presence of malfunction in cybernetic systems. A defining feature of psychopathology is the persistent inability to move towards personal goals, a result of the failure to develop effective new objectives, interpretations, or strategies when current ones are unsuccessful. We propose that substituting a cybernetic perspective for conceptualizations of psychopathology as statistical deviations or brain illnesses will lead to better measurement, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment.